Hoping to rebuff the NIMBY outrage Tuesday night, the pro-affordable housing development group Open New York, called on its supporters to testify on behalf of the project.
“An apartment building, it will hardly overwhelm or destroy the neighborhood,” the group’s executive director William Thomas testified. “The Bronx needs affordable housing. It is unlikely we’ll be able to meet these needs if whole community boards or Council districts just decide they won’t allow it. Not their problem, but it is their problem. It’s all our problem.”
During former Mayor Bill de Blasio’s tenure, just 58 units of subsidized housing were built in the community district, the fifth lowest number of any district in the city, according to a May report from the New York Housing Conference. The report found that de Blasio’s housing plan furthered racial segregation across the city, with predominantly Black and Latino communities seeing the vast majority of new affordable housing construction. A third of residents in the Bronx community district where the current project is planned are white, according to census estimates.
The local community board voted against the project in May, citing the need for “diversity of our city’s housing stock,” according to a letter by board chair Joseph Russ, though the board’s role is advisory. Local elected officials have lined up to block the development, including Assemblymember Michael Benedetto, who has no formal role in the land use rezoning process. He called on Gibson to honor the 2003 downzoning of the area passed under Mayor Michael Bloomberg.
“To upzone this area would be a stab in the back to those people who invested their savings in these houses and in the atmosphere that they have chosen to live in,” Benedetto said. “People came here and they wanted a particular feel about a community … They wanted something calmer.”
Councilmember Marjorie Velazquez also voiced opposition to the project saying she was worried about school overcrowding and parking. The Council typically defers to the local member on whether or not to approve rezonings so Velazquez’s opposition could doom the project when it makes it to the final hurdle of the city’s multi-tiered land use process. Past attempts to change the unwritten “member deference” rule have gone nowhere and city lawmakers have a long history of scuttling projects in their districts even over objections from fellow Council members.
Neighborhood residents have met the Throggs Neck plan with opposition at every turn. They launched a nonprofit dedicated to preserving the “existing beautiful suburban feel” of the neighborhood. A crowdfunding campaign that has raked in more than $36,000 for legal fees warns residents, “If we do not put a stop to this before it begins, our community and our way of life will never be the same.”
There have been raucous public meetings, where residents compared the rezoning to the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Velazquez skipped a recent community board meeting citing several threats she’d received, the Bronx Times reported.
In a private Facebook group for Throggs Neck residents, comments on the project veered into explicitly racist territory, according to screenshots provided by a Damaris Olivo, a spokesperson for the developers, with residents saying there were enough, ‘animals’ that moved in,” and saying the area would become a “warzone” if more subsidized housing was built. Olivo did not immediately respond to follow-up questions on the Facebook comments.
At a protest outside the Foodtown earlier this month, residents heckled people entering the supermarket, with one shouting the plan would bring, “low-income drug houses.”
Source : https://gothamist.com/news/nimby-development-fight-aims-to-preserve-slice-of-suburbia-in-the-east-bronx